Generation is matter-aware.
When a draft is linked to a matter, it is built on that matter's verified facts — grounded in your case, not generic output.
Back to LawVriksh
Pillar 02 · AI legal drafting for India
A draft where every lineshows its source.
Generate fast, yes. But more importantly, file with confidence: you always see what is source-backed and what still needs your eyes.
The question this answers
"Can I trust an AI draft I'll actually file in court?"
Yes — because every claim traces to a source you can check.
What it means
Most tools write from a prompt. This writes from your facts.
Source-linked drafting means the draft is written on top of the case's verified facts — and every important line can point to the source it came from: a document, a page, a citation.
This is the heart of our trust story. Speed is a side effect; traceability is the product.
A generic tool hands you a confident-sounding draft with invented facts, wrong sections, and case law that may not exist. Filing that is a professional risk — and an unverifiable draft is worse than no draft at all.
LawVriksh generates inside a matter, so the draft is built on facts you already extracted and verified. AI-written narrative is marked, not hidden, and every suggestion is a preview you accept, edit, or discard.
"It doesn't just write words that sound legal. It writes from your verified case facts — and shows you the source behind each claim."
The real problem
A draft you can't verify is a draft you can't trust.
Generic AI drafts
A confident-sounding draft with invented facts, wrong sections, and case law that may not exist. Filing it is a professional risk.
Copy-paste drafting
Rebuilding every petition from an old one, manually swapping names, FIR numbers and dates — slow and error-prone.
Which statute applies?
The applicable criminal law depends on the matter and its dates. Replacing an IPC reference automatically can introduce an error; review the statute in context.
"Where did this come from?"
On review, a senior can't tell which claim is backed by evidence and which the junior — or the AI — simply asserted.
The common thread: in litigation, an unverifiable draft is worse than no draft. Speed without trust is a liability, not a feature.
How it works
Generate. Fill with control. Cite. Check. File.
Drafting inside a matter means the case's verified facts are always within reach — and every claim can be tied back to evidence.
- 01
Draft inside a matter.
So the draft can use that case's verified facts — they surface as you write.
- 02
Generate from a prompt, language and template.
If the matter has verified facts, generation uses them automatically.
- 03
Fill with control.
Quick Fill drops in structured facts as a lookup; Magic Fill generates narrative — always a preview you accept, never a silent overwrite.
- 04
Cite as you write.
Link any claim to its supporting source so it traces back to evidence — and appears in the Sources tab.
- 05
Run analysis with Checks.
Review statute references against the matter dates, check internal logic, and assess compliance in one review layer.
- 06
Prepare to file.
Generate court-ready hearing prep and argument notes from the finished draft.
Speed is a side effect; traceability is the product. Every claim traces to a source you can check — and AI-written text is always marked, never hidden.
Behind the scenes
Why you can file with confidence.
Each capability below is a mechanism — the reason a claim about source-linked drafting is actually true.
AI content is marked, not hidden.
Magic Fill shows source-backed and AI-unverified text differently, and unverified claims keep an [AI] marker even after you accept them.
Nothing is overwritten silently.
Every Magic Fill output appears as a preview you explicitly accept, edit, or discard. The AI never changes legal text behind your back.
Citations stay in sync.
Link a citation and it updates the section's readiness, clears the matching "unsupported claim" finding, and appears in the Sources tab.
Checks is a real review layer.
It highlights statute references for review against the matter dates, checks internal logic, and runs compliance — a defined engine, not a guess.
Linked sources are version-aware.
If an underlying document changes after you drafted, the draft warns you — so it never quietly relies on stale evidence.
Before you ask
Source-linked drafting, answered plainly.
The draft is built on your matter's verified facts. Any AI-generated narrative is clearly marked, and unverified claims keep an [AI] tag that flows into Checks until you confirm them. You always see what is backed by a source and what isn't.
Yes. You can link any claim to its supporting document, and the Sources tab shows which document backs each section. That is the page-level trace.
Checks can surface statute references for review. Confirm which law applies to the offence and the matter dates; do not treat an IPC reference as incorrect solely because the BNS exists. The advocate must verify the applicable law before filing.
Never silently. Every AI suggestion is a preview you accept, edit, or discard. You stay in control of the legal text.
Yes. From a finished draft you generate court-ready argument notes — core arguments with page and citation references, key facts, and the prayer — in one step.
The complete legal workspace
File with confidence, not blind faith.
Join India's case intelligence workspace built on your own documents.
Book a demoOnly need research and drafting?
- Drafts grounded in verified facts
- Every claim source-linked
- Built for Indian legal practice